<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why did Google choose Python?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/why-did-google-choose-python/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/why-did-google-choose-python/</link>
	<description>Leveraging Perl and Emacs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 11:25:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: attractivechaos</title>
		<link>http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/why-did-google-choose-python/#comment-9358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[attractivechaos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 16:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=1481#comment-9358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To me, the single reason is that python is a cleaner and better programming language. At google, I doubt it has anything to do with C++ and Java. I do not know other google projects in C++, but for the few I know, they even do not use STL, let alone the more complicated boost. Jython is a much worse implementation in comparison to CPython. I have not seen any of my python/java fellows considered Jython.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, the single reason is that python is a cleaner and better programming language. At google, I doubt it has anything to do with C++ and Java. I do not know other google projects in C++, but for the few I know, they even do not use STL, let alone the more complicated boost. Jython is a much worse implementation in comparison to CPython. I have not seen any of my python/java fellows considered Jython.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JavaScript is the new Perl &#124; OCPsoft</title>
		<link>http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/why-did-google-choose-python/#comment-9356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JavaScript is the new Perl &#124; OCPsoft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=1481#comment-9356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] you don&#8217;t see that many big Python and Ruby shops either (Google is an exception,) so unless CoffeeScript offers some of the same safety features of Java, it will probably end up [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you don&#8217;t see that many big Python and Ruby shops either (Google is an exception,) so unless CoffeeScript offers some of the same safety features of Java, it will probably end up [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kirkfortune</title>
		<link>http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/why-did-google-choose-python/#comment-9355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kirkfortune]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 05:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=1481#comment-9355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://kirkstuff.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/3/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My Blog&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://kirkstuff.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/3/" rel="nofollow">My Blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yegor</title>
		<link>http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/why-did-google-choose-python/#comment-9302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yegor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 20:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=1481#comment-9302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Hank: Inline::C, FFI::Raw for C/C++ integration a pretty straightworward]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hank: Inline::C, FFI::Raw for C/C++ integration a pretty straightworward</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: link</title>
		<link>http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/why-did-google-choose-python/#comment-9295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[link]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 04:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=1481#comment-9295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello there,  You&#039;ve performed an incredible job. I&#039;ll certainly digg it and for my part recommend to my friends. I&#039;m confident they&#039;ll be benefited from this site.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello there,  You&#8217;ve performed an incredible job. I&#8217;ll certainly digg it and for my part recommend to my friends. I&#8217;m confident they&#8217;ll be benefited from this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank</title>
		<link>http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/why-did-google-choose-python/#comment-9289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=1481#comment-9289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where Python wins over Perl, for me, is interoperability with C. That is crucial. It sucks in Perl, it is arcane and hard, and to this days, the Perl community has not given a shit about it.
As far as language design goes m odern Perl, with stuff like Moose, makes it much more advanced than Python. The fact is, Perl is faster and more powerful than Python, which has serious design flaws. Today&#039;s Perl object system is almost as advanced as Common Lisp&#039;s (which is the more advanced object oriented system out there).
But if your language plays well with others (C, C++) then you get network effects.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where Python wins over Perl, for me, is interoperability with C. That is crucial. It sucks in Perl, it is arcane and hard, and to this days, the Perl community has not given a shit about it.<br />
As far as language design goes m odern Perl, with stuff like Moose, makes it much more advanced than Python. The fact is, Perl is faster and more powerful than Python, which has serious design flaws. Today&#8217;s Perl object system is almost as advanced as Common Lisp&#8217;s (which is the more advanced object oriented system out there).<br />
But if your language plays well with others (C, C++) then you get network effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meh</title>
		<link>http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/why-did-google-choose-python/#comment-9277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 22:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=1481#comment-9277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is cheap and looks for shortcuts simple as that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is cheap and looks for shortcuts simple as that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grg</title>
		<link>http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/why-did-google-choose-python/#comment-9259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=1481#comment-9259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The kicker for me is ctypes, I&#039;ve done XS in perl, and I know there&#039;s some work being done on a Perl Ctypes, but it&#039;s not yet as straightforward or as polished as the Python implementation.  Makes it painless to prototype in Python and kick functions down into C as necessary.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The kicker for me is ctypes, I&#8217;ve done XS in perl, and I know there&#8217;s some work being done on a Perl Ctypes, but it&#8217;s not yet as straightforward or as polished as the Python implementation.  Makes it painless to prototype in Python and kick functions down into C as necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nigratruo</title>
		<link>http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/why-did-google-choose-python/#comment-9200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nigratruo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 22:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=1481#comment-9200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/3882

Eric Raymond says it best: 
Perl code is just a mess when you look later at it, it is hard to know what you did there, unless you are one heck of a master programmer that does nothing else in life. For me this is a question of new against old. Perl is the old, Python is the new. I am amazed of how easy Python code is to read and I am strictly not a programmer, have never been good at it, but with Python I am writing code and even build GUIs that work. The time effort required is also ok. I did not think such a thing would be possible, after looking at Java, VisualBasic, bash scripting, C and Perl, that Python could be so different, but it is. Things might be different if you are highly invested in Perl, but as a newby that did not know neither Perl or Python, Python is definitely the better choice. I applaud that Google chose Python, as many companies have a Perl only policy and for me this is a little &quot;we have always used it and will always use it&quot;, so tradition against new stuff.
And Perl can become a huge nightmare, especially for larger projects, when Spaghetti code tries to strangle you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/3882" rel="nofollow">http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/3882</a></p>
<p>Eric Raymond says it best:<br />
Perl code is just a mess when you look later at it, it is hard to know what you did there, unless you are one heck of a master programmer that does nothing else in life. For me this is a question of new against old. Perl is the old, Python is the new. I am amazed of how easy Python code is to read and I am strictly not a programmer, have never been good at it, but with Python I am writing code and even build GUIs that work. The time effort required is also ok. I did not think such a thing would be possible, after looking at Java, VisualBasic, bash scripting, C and Perl, that Python could be so different, but it is. Things might be different if you are highly invested in Perl, but as a newby that did not know neither Perl or Python, Python is definitely the better choice. I applaud that Google chose Python, as many companies have a Perl only policy and for me this is a little &#8220;we have always used it and will always use it&#8221;, so tradition against new stuff.<br />
And Perl can become a huge nightmare, especially for larger projects, when Spaghetti code tries to strangle you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergio</title>
		<link>http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/why-did-google-choose-python/#comment-9162</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sergio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=1481#comment-9162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The folks at Google chose Python, probably because that is what they learned while at the University. You can write extremely good applications in any programming language, provided you put the required effort in testing and quality measures.

This is like asking in what language can you write the most beautiful love letters, in English, German or Spanish ?

Particular applications will come out faster or better if they have had better versions available at the start time.

I believe the human kind should work more on sharing the good ideas and methods and less in comparing which method is better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The folks at Google chose Python, probably because that is what they learned while at the University. You can write extremely good applications in any programming language, provided you put the required effort in testing and quality measures.</p>
<p>This is like asking in what language can you write the most beautiful love letters, in English, German or Spanish ?</p>
<p>Particular applications will come out faster or better if they have had better versions available at the start time.</p>
<p>I believe the human kind should work more on sharing the good ideas and methods and less in comparing which method is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
