Comments on: Programming With Types http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2010/05/01/programming-with-types/ Leveraging Perl and Emacs Tue, 07 May 2013 11:25:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Jared http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2010/05/01/programming-with-types/#comment-7973 Wed, 12 May 2010 19:52:26 +0000 http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=851#comment-7973 Hi Jisang,

Yes, I did mean setf. Thanks, fixed!

]]> By: Jisang Yoo http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2010/05/01/programming-with-types/#comment-7968 Wed, 12 May 2010 13:03:28 +0000 http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=851#comment-7968 “because of fset, you only need a getter.”

You mean setf?

]]> By: Jared http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2010/05/01/programming-with-types/#comment-7901 Sat, 01 May 2010 19:56:54 +0000 http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=851#comment-7901 Hi John,

I’m glad you enjoyed it. And I think types are important in perl too. The nice syntax for nested types (perhaps unfortunately) means you can be a bit more slapdash when you stick everything in your nested hash.

]]> By: john napiorkowski http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2010/05/01/programming-with-types/#comment-7900 Sat, 01 May 2010 16:44:50 +0000 http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=851#comment-7900 Personally I don’t mind to see the occasional non perl blog :)

Also, I am very interested in types, since I’ve been spending a lot of time on the side thinking about Moose types and where that’s going to go. So reading this was actually relevant to me for a Perl project.

]]>