<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Batch Text Processing With Emacs Lisp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2009/05/22/batch-text-processing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2009/05/22/batch-text-processing/</link>
	<description>Leveraging Perl and Emacs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 11:25:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2009/05/22/batch-text-processing/#comment-7645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 09:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=626#comment-7645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Randy,

Don&#039;t worry, I&#039;m not offended :)  Yes, this could be done in Perl, but why bother when I&#039;m using emacs anyway and the lisp engine is right there?  And I find that the REPL and incremental development makes it much nicer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Randy,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry, I&#8217;m not offended <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Yes, this could be done in Perl, but why bother when I&#8217;m using emacs anyway and the lisp engine is right there?  And I find that the REPL and incremental development makes it much nicer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randy</title>
		<link>http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2009/05/22/batch-text-processing/#comment-7643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=626#comment-7643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No offense.. But isn&#039;t what Perl is for ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense.. But isn&#8217;t what Perl is for ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2009/05/22/batch-text-processing/#comment-7586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=626#comment-7586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Jisang,

&lt;pre&gt;kmacro-edit-macro&lt;/pre&gt; might be what you are looking for.  It doesn&#039;t exactly make a function, but it does allow you to edit the macro fairly simply.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jisang,</p>
<pre>kmacro-edit-macro</pre>
<p> might be what you are looking for.  It doesn&#8217;t exactly make a function, but it does allow you to edit the macro fairly simply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jisang Yoo</title>
		<link>http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2009/05/22/batch-text-processing/#comment-7580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jisang Yoo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 19:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=626#comment-7580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recording a macro is really easy while writing a function is difficult (compared to recording a macro).

Reading and modifying a function is easy while a macro, which is a sequence of keys, is hard to read and I don&#039;t know how to modify a macro.

There must be a way to combine the good of macros and the good of functions. Does anybody know how to automatically convert a macro to a readable function?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recording a macro is really easy while writing a function is difficult (compared to recording a macro).</p>
<p>Reading and modifying a function is easy while a macro, which is a sequence of keys, is hard to read and I don&#8217;t know how to modify a macro.</p>
<p>There must be a way to combine the good of macros and the good of functions. Does anybody know how to automatically convert a macro to a readable function?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2009/05/22/batch-text-processing/#comment-7572</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 22:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=626#comment-7572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Dressguard,

I like your question and I think it deserves a more extensive answer than I&#039;m going to give here.

The reason I wrote a function for this is fairly obvious - I need to extract similar data based on a provided file every day (and I have not got around to automating it) therefore a throw-away macro would be unsatisfactory.

I&#039;m not sure how the fact that it is possible on OpenOffice is relevant.  Although it is great to hear it is scriptable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dressguard,</p>
<p>I like your question and I think it deserves a more extensive answer than I&#8217;m going to give here.</p>
<p>The reason I wrote a function for this is fairly obvious &#8211; I need to extract similar data based on a provided file every day (and I have not got around to automating it) therefore a throw-away macro would be unsatisfactory.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how the fact that it is possible on OpenOffice is relevant.  Although it is great to hear it is scriptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dressguard</title>
		<link>http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2009/05/22/batch-text-processing/#comment-7567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dressguard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 10:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=626#comment-7567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you kidding me? This is a typical case for a throw-away macro! You can even do the sort in OpenOffice if you want. Why write a function for this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding me? This is a typical case for a throw-away macro! You can even do the sort in OpenOffice if you want. Why write a function for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
