Comments on: Imperfect Documentation http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/shoddy-documentation/ Leveraging Perl and Emacs Tue, 07 May 2013 11:25:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Atomized » Blog Archive » User experience and the need to document http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/shoddy-documentation/#comment-7485 Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:53:27 +0000 http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=500#comment-7485 [...] And the debate rages on. [...]

]]> By: Jared http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/shoddy-documentation/#comment-7460 Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:51:34 +0000 http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=500#comment-7460 Hi Aaron,

That is what I would expect. It is nice to see from the wiki that most people in the community are helpful.

Cheers

]]> By: aaron http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/shoddy-documentation/#comment-7459 Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:54:30 +0000 http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=500#comment-7459 Trying the URL again.

http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs?action=browse;diff=2;id=SearchAtPoint;diffrevision=61;revision=62

]]> By: aaron http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/shoddy-documentation/#comment-7458 Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:54:05 +0000 http://curiousprogrammer.wordpress.com/?p=500#comment-7458 Don’t get down on yourself. Sometimes, the best way to communicate what you’re trying to do in Emacs is with code! So fortunately, another Emacs user could see the duplication of your Emacs Lisp and mention an alternative.

This sort of thing happens all the time:

]]>